Disclaimer: During the process of creating this review, AQUM Browser has been renamed to 0Detect. The functionality remained the same.
It’s been a while since we’ve published a comparison article, long enough for a new challenger to make itself known!
AQUM Browser is an anti-detect browser from Ukraine that stepped onto the scene in February of 2024. It claims to be up to any multi-accounting task and attracts fence-sitters with an intriguing forever-free tier.
Will that be enough for AQUM Browser to shake up the market, or does the service still need some time in the oven? Let’s take a thorough look at the upstart and see how its features, user experience, and pricing compare to an old hand like Gologin.
TL;DR: You’ll find a comparison table that covers all the main points in the Final Thoughts section.

AQUM Browser – First Impressions On The Newcomer
AQUM Browser welcomes you with a serviceable landing page that explains its use cases and highlights features like an extensive fingerprint database. Account creation and installation are straightforward. The AQUM Browser desktop app updates automatically at first launch.
Profile & Proxy Setup
The interface is clean and functional. Still, a newbie might not know what to do from there since there are no explainer pop-ups or onboarding tools.
A few gaps we flagged have since been addressed: profiles can now be saved as reusable “Patterns” for one-click cloning, cookie files can be dragged directly into a profile to populate it instantly, and there’s now an official import tool for migrating profiles from other anti-detect browsers. API support with Puppeteer/Selenium compatibility has also been added, something entirely absent from our original tests.

You can set up new default profiles with a single click. Manually creating profiles lets you pick between Windows 10/11 and MacOS, set up a hardware combination with a wide selection of GPUs, import bookmarks, assign a proxy, and more.

AQUM doesn’t offer proxies as part of the deal, so you’ll have to cover that yourself. The Proxy tab is the place to add new and configure existing ones. Copy-pasting proxy info in the Host field will fill everything in. Convenient but still not as simple as Gologin’s built-in proxies.

Closing AQUM shuts it down instead of minimizing to the system tray. It does give you a heads-up on saving any changes before exiting. However, you’ll likely turn that notification off and might lose precious data if you forget how AQUM behaves.
Organization & Mass Actions
Adding tags or rearranging profiles according to age, name, etc., is handy once your list starts growing. You can’t rearrange them by dragging and dropping, though. Folders are a no-go, too, meaning AQUM Browser isn’t ideal for scaling up operations or team-based segmentation.

Mass actions are available yet limited. You can start multiple profiles or assign tags and proxies. A bit more basic than we’d have liked. Still, it does help with organization.
Fingerprinting
Browser profiles emulate Windows and MacOS. Linux is also present but grayed out. There’s a free app you can use with Team and Professional plans intended for team member management or communication. Logging on to AQUM’s website provides an overview of your plan and lets you change account settings. There’s no cloud functionality – you do everything from the desktop app’s dashboard.
0Detect now markets its Canvas protection as pulling from a proprietary database of real hardware fingerprints rather than algorithmically generated ones, a similar pitch to what we’ve seen from other anti-detect tools claiming their spoofing is closer to “real” data than synthetic noise.
The GPU selection is all jumbled up. At least there’s a search bar!
The developers make a big deal of AQUM’s ability to pass fingerprinting scans. That’s a crucial consideration for any anti-detect browser use case, whether you’re a privacy-focused single user or a business that needs to scale up data gathering or marketing efforts without the hassle of getting flagged or restricted.
We used IPhey and Pixelscan to check for fingerprinting inconsistencies. AQUM managed to pass both scans without issues.

Reputation & Technical Support
This is usually the part where we’d point out any dodgy reviews or other inconsistencies with a browser’s online reputation. There’s almost nothing to report on AQUM in that respect because it has practically no online presence.
Nothing pops up if you search for AQUM on TrustPilot, G2, or Capterra. The few testimonials on the home page look generic, and we couldn’t verify them.
The broader community isn’t aware of AQUM – searching for it on Reddit only brought up a bunch of stuff related to aquariums. There are a couple of review videos on YouTube, but both “reviewers” read from the exact same script and don’t tell you much about AQUM’s functionality.
0Detect’s online footprint has grown substantially since our original testing. The company now runs a genuine technical blog covering topics like WebRTC/DNS leak prevention, Canvas and WebGL fingerprinting mechanics, and headless-browser detection, a sharp contrast to the near-total online silence we documented under the AQUM name. That said, the customer testimonials featured on the site skew heavily toward gambling, account farming, and ad-arbitrage use cases, which is worth keeping in mind when judging how “mainstream” the tool has become.
Official sources don’t help either. There’s an Instagram account with a few followers that posts only in Ukrainian. The mobile app has nine reviews on Google Play, with two nonsensical written ones.
We used IPhey and Pixelscan to check for fingerprinting inconsistencies. AQUM Browser managed to pass both scans without issues.
The Support button on the website has you message the customer support team via Telegram. The response times are reasonable, but working hours are 9 AM to 9 PM Kyiv time. Perfect for users based in Europe, not so great if something goes wrong for an LA startup at 2PM and they can’t fix it until the next day.
See also: 10 Best Antidetect Browsers of 2025: How to Choose One
Gologin – The Established, Feature-Rich AQUM Browser Alternative
AQUM Browser covers the basics well enough, emphasis on basics. A long-standing, trusted alternative like Gologin might look similar at first glance. Yet, experienced users and businesses operating on a large scale will get much more out of it. Let’s see how the two stack up feature-wise and compare what investing in each gets you later on.
Gologin User Experience & Features
If Gologin has nailed anything, it’s turning people without any anti-detect or proxy use experience into competent users. The journey starts at account creation, where you can select the services and websites you’ll use the browser for.

Launching the desktop app brings you to the intuitive interface already populated with a handful of profiles based on your previous selection. Apart from setting each profile’s proxy to a desired geographic location, they’re good to go. You can buy a proxy from the dashboard if you don’t want the defaults.

Organization is another Gologin standout. You can freely rearrange profiles or declutter the dashboard by creating a folder system. This streamlines team efficiency since you can assign folders to team members for more effective management and collaboration.
Gologin’s comprehensive mass actions
A minor nitpick with AQUM’s Tags is that they’re small and only have a colored dot to distinguish them. Gologin’s Statuses are larger and have colored outlines, so they’re easy to tell apart.
System & Technical Support
The mobile Gologin app is fully fleshed out, letting you manage as well as use profiles on Android and iOS. There’s also the option to log into the cloud version. This can be useful when you need access from a device you don’t regularly use or in the event of sudden system failure.
You have several options to exhaust before contacting tech support. AQUM Browser has a barebones FAQ that addresses only a few questions about subscriptions and profile editing. In contrast, Gologin maintains FAQ and troubleshooting sections and links to useful resources like browser fingerprint scanners. They also have a YouTube channel with tutorial videos on using multiple accounts with different programs and services.
If those don’t help, you can reach out to 24/7 customer support and get competent answers there.
Reputation
Gologin is the clear winner when it comes to online presence, not that AQUM put up a fight in that respect. It’s hard to gauge if an anti-detect browser no one is vouching for is a good fit for your use case. To hesitate is natural, especially for first-timers.
A typical example of the Gologin customer experience
You don’t have to trawl the internet to find credible reviews from actual Gologin users, let alone basic information on the company. A quick search reveals people consistently praise its ease of use and customization options. The website suggests it’s a good tool for social media management, e-commerce, or data gathering. Real-world user professional positions and sentiments reflect this.
Download Gologin for free and manage multiple accounts without bans!
AQUM vs Gologin – Pricing Comparison
Free Plans & Trial Periods
AQUM’s “free forever” tier looks a lot less generous these days. Since a June 2025 user-agreement update, the free plan is capped at just one profile and one proxy, and 0Detect (as AQUM is now branded) explicitly prohibits multi-accounting on it, a notable reversal for a browser whose entire premise is running multiple accounts. Free users who’d built up several profiles were given a deadline to migrate to a paid tier or lose access.
Paid Plans
The “Starter” tier gives AQUM a small leg up since Gologin has no equivalent. It includes 50 profiles and 15 saved proxies without access to more advanced features for $20/month. This tier reinforces AQUM’s position as a viable provider for small to medium-scale operations.

Gologin’s “Professional” plan costs $49/month (or $24/month billed annually) for 100 profiles, with 2GB of built-in resident proxy bandwidth included, 24/7 support, one cloud profile launch, and REST API access at 300 requests/minute. Ten times the profiles of 0Detect’s entry tier for roughly four times the price — and proxies are already included.
0Detect’s “Personal” tier sits at $59.99/month for 130 profiles and about 60 external proxy slots, still single-user with no team access, just the ability to transfer profiles.
Gologin’s “Business” plan (its most popular) costs $99/month ($49/month annually) for 300 profiles, two cloud launches, and API access at 500 requests/minute, plus actual team collaboration, which 0Detect’s equivalent price point still doesn’t offer.
0Detect’s “Team” tier, at $159.99/month, unlocks 350 profiles, around 260 external proxy slots, API access, and room for up to 3 team members.
Gologin’s “Enterprise” plan costs $199/month ($99/month annually) for 1,000 profiles, three cloud launches, 800 RPM API access, and scalable team seats (extra members can be added for roughly $5 each) — nearly triple the profiles of 0Detect’s top standard tier, with built-in proxies and cloud access neither AQUM nor 0Detect has ever offered.

For larger operations, Gologin’s “Custom” plan starts at $299/month ($149/month annually) for a 2,000-profile minimum, scaling up to 100,000 profiles on request. 0Detect’s top listed tier (“Professional”) reportedly runs somewhere between $209.99 and $299.99/month for around 1,200 profiles, depending on which price tracker you check, the two most recent third-party listings we found disagree with each other by about $90, and 0Detect’s own pricing page loads its numbers dynamically rather than publishing them as static text, so this figure is worth confirming directly with their sales team before quoting it as fact.
As before, annual billing favors Gologin more heavily: a 50% discount across the board versus 0Detect’s plans, where the “up to 30%” annual discount shown on their pricing page applies unevenly depending on the tier.
AQUM Browser vs Gologin – Final Thoughts
Before you read the summary, here’s a quick recap in table form:
| Comparison Criteria | AQUM Browser |
Gologin |
| Free plan | ✅ | ✅ |
| Free trial of paid plans | ❌ | ✅ |
| Feature-rich | ❌ | ✅ |
| Beginner-friendly | ✅ | ✅ |
| Country of origin | 🇺🇦 | 🇺🇲 |
| Update frequency | ✅ | ✅ |
| Affordable paid plans | ❌ | ✅ |
| Mobile app | ✅ | ✅ |
| Profile cloud launch | ❌ | ✅ |
| Free in-app proxies | ❌ | ✅ |
| Trusted reputation | ❌ | ✅ |
AQUM’s developers have managed to create a competent anti-detect browser for users with modest requirements. However, it’s clearly not on par with Gologin in several key areas.
Gologin presents an easy-to-use veneer that easily gives way to in-depth customization and advanced options once the user is ready. AQUM is straightforward to use but also easier to exhaust. Pricing at higher tiers is a major misstep, especially if you consider the lack of social proof that might make prospective clients reconsider.
If it successfully overcomes its growing pains and introduces more competitive pricing, AQUM might become a competitor to watch out for in the future. Gologin is ready to meet your professional needs regardless of scale today.
Download Gologin for free and manage multiple accounts without bans!
Read other posts about Reviews of browsers:
- Kameleo browser review
- Best virtual browser
- Multilogin chrome browser
- Adspower browser vs gologin
- Morelogin browser alternative
- Incogniton vs gologin
- Best proxy browser
- Browserjet review
- Roxybrowser review
- Gologin vs hidemium
- Xlogin review
- Insomniac browser review
- Swspybrowser review
- Yunlark review
- Loginways review
- Nstbrowser review
- Hydraheaders browser review
- Maskfog review
- Vision-browser review
- Ultimate orb review
- AntBrowser-browser-review
- Vmlogin browser review
- Gologin-vs-identory
- Gologin-vs-switch antidetect
- Antikbrowser review
- Camoufox review
- Geelark review
- Dicloak online browser
- Vmmask antidetect browser
- Hidemyacc browser review
- Rebrowser review
- Session-box-vs gologin
- Multibrowser-review
- Accovod-vs-gologin
- Xbrowser review
- Undetectable browser
- Bitbrowser-review
- Fingerprintswitcher
- Aezakmi browser review
- Marketerbrowser review
- Genlogin browser review
- Linken-sphere review
- Indigo-browser
- Xpass browser alternative
- Wade browser review
- Surfinite review
- Lalicat-browser review
- Masq-antidetect review
- Octo-browser vs gologin
- Dolphin-anty vs gologin
- Mulogin review
- Lauth review
- Che browser vs gologin
- Logii review



