Nstbrowser Review 2026: Pricing, Fingerprint Tests vs Gologin
Try Gologin for free
Nstbrowser is a browser for managing many accounts that is built around automation: RPA, an API, an AI agent and CAPTCHA solving come with every plan, the free one included. In our October 2026 test it passed Pixelscan and CreepJS but scored only 30 on Iphey, the lowest result of the 12 browsers we tested. Gologin passed all three checkers.
Nstbrowser’s pricing is built differently from Gologin’s: it charges for profile launches, not profiles. Its free plan holds 500 profiles but allows 30 launches a day, and its cheapest paid plan is $29.90 a month, or $17.93 on yearly billing. Gologin starts at $9 a month, or $4.50 on yearly billing.
Prices below were checked on both vendors’ sites on November 4, 2026. The fingerprint tests come from our test of 12 browsers, run on October 2, 2026.
Switching from Nstbrowser? Gologin has a free plan with 3 profiles and a 7-day trial of every paid feature, no card required. See how switching to Gologin works →
Summary Table: Nstbrowser vs Gologin
| Nstbrowser | Gologin | |
|---|---|---|
| Pixelscan | ✅ Consistent | ✅ Consistent, no proxy detected |
| Iphey | ❌ Unreliable (MX 30) | ✅ Trustworthy (MX 100) |
| CreepJS: headless / tampering / “like headless” | 0% / 0% / 25% | 0% / 0% / 31% |
| Chrome engine on test day (latest: 154) | 149 | 152 (Orbita) |
| Median launch of a new profile | 4.7 s | 4.0 s |
| Free plan | 500 profiles, 30 launches a day, 3 team members | 3 profiles, no launch limit |
| Free trial of paid features | No | 7 days, no card required |
| Cheapest paid plan | Starter: $29.90/mo, $17.93/mo yearly | Professional 10: $9/mo, $4.50/mo yearly |
| Billed by | Profile launches (3,000 a day on Starter) | Number of profiles |
| Proxy traffic in paid plans | 1 to 2 GB a month of each type | 2 GB residential from Professional 25 |
| Automation | RPA, API, AI agent, Puppeteer, Playwright, Selenium on every plan | REST API, SDKs and MCP server from Professional 100 |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS; Linux only through a Docker image in beta | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, web |
| Reviews | Trustpilot 3.3 (18 reviews) | G2 4.7, Capterra 4.6 |
Choose Nstbrowser if you run scraping or automation with thousands of profiles, write your own scripts and can check every profile’s fingerprint by hand.
Choose Gologin if you need clean fingerprints out of the box, apps for every platform including phones, and a simple price per profile.
Nstbrowser: Built for Automation
Homepage & Installation
Nstbrowser’s homepage puts automation first. Next to the browser it now lists an RPA marketplace, AI Agent Skills, a Web Unblocker, a CAPTCHA solver for five CAPTCHA types and its own proxies from $0.40 per GB. The company behind it is NST LABS TECH LTD; the site doesn’t say where it is registered.
The app runs on Windows 10 and later (64-bit) and on macOS, with separate builds for Intel and Apple Silicon. The download page showed version 1.23.2. There is no Linux app and no mobile app. For servers, Nstbrowser offers a Docker image with a Linux environment, still marked beta.
Registering a free account and downloading the app went smoothly for us. After the first login, the app took about half a minute to sync with the online dashboard.
Profile Creation & Management
Experienced users won’t need long to find their way around Nstbrowser. Beginners get less help: there is no introductory tour, and the video tutorials only give a short overview.
You can create profiles one by one, in batches, or by importing them. The simplest form asks for a name, a group and a combination of operating system and browser; Chromium on Windows 11 is the default.
Nstbrowser doesn’t warn you when the chosen operating system doesn’t match your computer, so beginners can create a profile that is easy to spot without knowing it.
Groups and bulk actions make it easier to manage many profiles. You can sort profiles only by name and launch time, though.
Proxy Setup & Fingerprint Settings
Nstbrowser asks you to create a proxy folder before you add proxies. After that, you can paste proxies in several formats and check them in bulk.
Paid plans now include proxy traffic every month: 1 GB each of residential, IPv6 and datacenter traffic on Starter, 1.5 GB on Growth and 2 GB on Scale. The free plan includes none.
During profile creation you can fine-tune the fingerprint: noise settings, memory, MAC address and other values. That control matters, because the default settings didn’t pass every checker in our test: the profile got Spanish (es-US) as its language on a US proxy, and Iphey rated the fingerprint and location as inconsistent. Check these values on every new profile.
Automation Features
Automation is Nstbrowser’s main strength, and every plan, including the free one, gets the same features: RPA, an API, an AI agent, custom extensions, containers, access management, window and cookie management and batch creation.
The RPA marketplace has ready scripts for tasks like collecting cookies or scraping Amazon listings. The Workflow tab lets you build your own scripts from nodes, without code. Most nodes are easy to understand, but the documentation could go deeper.
Browserless is Nstbrowser’s headless mode. It runs browsers in the background or in a Docker container and works with Puppeteer, Playwright and Selenium. The CAPTCHA solver is paid per use, from $0.60 to $3.80 per 1,000 requests depending on the CAPTCHA type and plan.
Nstbrowser Reviews
Nstbrowser has few public reviews. On Trustpilot it scores 3.3 from 18 reviews, only 2 of them from the last 12 months. Positive reviews praise the free plan, the free API access and easy setup. Negative ones mention bugs, slow support and sudden logouts that closed running browsers.
Many older reviews are about the free plan. In 2024 it allowed 1,000 launches a day and 5 team members; Nstbrowser then cut it to 10 launches a day without notice. Since then the limit has gone up to 30 launches a day, but the change still shapes the brand’s reviews. Its homepage still mentions 1,000 launches a day on the free plan, while the pricing page lists 30.
Nstbrowser’s homepage promises 24/7 support. Users reach it through a contact form, Discord and Telegram.
Gologin: the Alternative for Teams and Users of Every Level
Let’s look at Gologin and why it is a strong alternative to Nstbrowser.
User Experience
Gologin is easy to start with. The app asks a few questions about your work, adds sample profiles and shows you how to create your own. The “+” button creates a profile in one click: type a name, pick a location, and Gologin builds the fingerprint for you.
As you grow, you can sort and group profiles by many criteria and run bulk actions from one panel that stays easy to use.
Gologin runs on Windows, macOS and Linux. It also has native Android and iOS apps that sync profiles with the desktop, and a cloud browser that runs profiles in a web tab from Professional 50. Every plan includes cloud Android phones: 30 minutes a month on Professional, 60 on Business and 120 on Enterprise.
Proxies are built in: residential, mobile and datacenter IPs in 195 countries. Plans from Professional 25 include 2 GB of residential traffic, and extra traffic costs $1 per GB.
Reputation & Customer Support
Gologin scores 4.7 on G2 and 4.6 on Capterra. Reviewers most often praise its ease of use, cloud sync and fingerprint settings. Many also like that the dashboard can be detailed or minimal, as you need.
Support works 24/7 and can be reached right from the app.
Fingerprint Tests: Nstbrowser vs Gologin
We ran both browsers on the same day, on the same Windows 11 laptop, with a new US residential proxy from FloppyData for each browser and default profile settings. Every browser went through Pixelscan, then Iphey, then CreepJS in one session. The full method is in our test of 12 browsers.
Nstbrowser Test Results
Pixelscan found Nstbrowser’s fingerprint consistent.
Iphey gave Nstbrowser the lowest score in our test: Unreliable, with an MX score of 30. It rated both the browser fingerprint and the location data as inconsistent.
CreepJS showed 0% headless, 0% tampering and 25% “like headless”. The engine was Chrome 149, five versions behind the latest, and a new profile took a median of 4.7 seconds to start (4.7, 4.9 and 4.1 seconds).
Gologin Test Results
Gologin passed all three checkers. Pixelscan found the fingerprint consistent and didn’t detect the proxy.
Iphey rated the profile Trustworthy with an MX score of 100. Timezone, language and location matched the proxy automatically.
CreepJS showed 0% headless, 0% tampering and 31% “like headless”. Gologin ran on Orbita 152, two versions behind the latest Chrome, and started a new profile in a median of 4.0 seconds (4.3, 4.0 and 3.9 seconds).
Comparison
| Test | Nstbrowser | Gologin |
|---|---|---|
| Pixelscan | ✅ Consistent | ✅ Consistent, no proxy detected |
| Iphey | ❌ Unreliable (MX 30) | ✅ Trustworthy (MX 100) |
| CreepJS: headless / tampering / “like headless” | 0% / 0% / 25% | 0% / 0% / 31% |
| Chrome engine (latest: 154) | 149 | 152 |
| Median launch | 4.7 s | 4.0 s |
Gologin passed every checker with default settings. Nstbrowser can reach a clean result too, but only after you fix the language and location settings by hand. Gologin also ran a newer engine and started profiles faster.
Pros/Cons & Trustworthiness
| Nstbrowser pros | Nstbrowser cons |
|---|---|
| Automation on every plan: RPA, API, AI agent and no-code workflows, even on the free plan. | Weak default fingerprint: Iphey rated it Unreliable (MX 30) in our test. |
| Many profiles for little money: 20,000 profiles from $17.93/mo on yearly billing. | Launch limits: 30 launches a day on the free plan, 3,000 on Starter, then paid per launch. |
| Generous free plan: 500 profiles and 3 team members. | Old engine: Chrome 149 on test day, five versions behind. |
| Proxy traffic in paid plans: 1 to 2 GB a month of each type. | No Linux or phone apps: Windows and macOS only, Linux through a Docker beta. |
| Built-in CAPTCHA solver, paid per use. | No free trial and no downgrades in the middle of a billing period. |
| Gologin pros | Gologin cons |
|---|---|
| Clean test results: passed Pixelscan, Iphey and CreepJS with default settings. | Older engine than the newest browsers: Orbita 152 was two versions behind on test day. |
| Every platform: Windows, macOS, Linux, a cloud browser and native Android and iOS apps. | Higher price at thousands of profiles: priced per profile, not per launch. |
| Free trial: 7 days of every paid feature, then 3 free profiles forever. | API from Professional 100: smaller plans have no API access. |
| No launch limits: start profiles as often as you need. | No built-in RPA or AI agent: AI tools connect through the MCP server. |
| Proxies built in: 2 GB of residential traffic from Professional 25, then $1 per GB. |
Nstbrowser vs Gologin: Pricing Comparison
Trials & Free Plans
Nstbrowser has no free trial of its paid plans, but its free plan doesn’t cut features: you get RPA, the API and the AI agent with 500 profiles and 3 team members. The limit is launches: 30 standard profile launches a day. Every launch over the limit costs $0.01, and the free plan includes no proxy traffic.
Gologin gives 7 days of every paid feature without a card. After the trial, 3 profiles stay free forever, with no limit on launches.
Nstbrowser Prices in 2026
Nstbrowser has two sets of plans. Standard plans are for people who manage profiles. Developer plans are for running one-time profiles through the API at scale. Both are billed monthly, quarterly with a 10% discount or yearly with a 40% discount. Payment is by card or PayPal.
| Standard plan | Profiles | Standard launches a day | Team members | Proxy traffic a month (each type) | Monthly | Yearly (per month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 500 | 30 | 3 | — | $0 | $0 |
| Starter | 20,000 | 3,000 | 20 | 1 GB | $29.90 | $17.93 |
| Growth | 100,000 | 20,000 | 50 | 1.5 GB | $49.90 | $29.93 |
| Scale | 500,000 | 50,000 | 100 | 2 GB | $89.90 | $53.93 |
| Developer plan | Profiles | One-time launches a day | Standard launches a day | Team members | Monthly | Yearly (per month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | 2,000 | 100,000 | 500 | 50 | $89.90 | $53.93 |
| Scale | 5,000 | 200,000 | 1,000 | 100 | $159.90 | $95.93 |
Usage over the limits is billed per use. A standard launch over the limit costs $0.015 on Starter, $0.01 on Free and Growth, and $0.008 on Scale. Extra residential traffic costs $1.50 to $1.80 per GB, datacenter $0.60 to $0.80 and IPv6 $0.30 to $0.40, and a static ISP IP costs $2.50.
You can upgrade any time and pay the difference. You can’t downgrade in the middle of a period: you can only choose a cheaper plan for the next billing cycle.
Gologin Prices in 2026
Gologin’s paid plans are billed monthly, or yearly at half the price, with no launch limits.
| Plan | Profiles | Monthly | Yearly (per month) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 3 | $0 | $0 |
| Professional 10 | 10 | $9 | $4.50 |
| Professional 25 | 25 | $19 | $9.50 |
| Professional 50 | 50 | $29 | $14.50 |
| Professional 100 | 100 | $39 | $19.50 |
| Business 300 | 300 | $99 | $49.50 |
| Business 500 | 500 | $139 | $69.50 |
| Enterprise | 1,000 | $179 | $89.50 |
| Custom | 2,000 | $279 | $139.50 |
Plans from Professional 25 include 2 GB of residential proxy traffic and profile sharing. The cloud browser comes from Professional 50, and the REST API, SDKs and MCP server from Professional 100.
Which Is Cheaper?
- Up to 25 profiles: Gologin costs less: $4.50 a month for 10 profiles and $9.50 for 25 on yearly billing, against $17.93 for Nstbrowser Starter. If you start fewer than 30 profiles a day, Nstbrowser’s free plan costs nothing.
- 100 profiles started every day: Nstbrowser’s free plan would bill 70 extra launches a day, about $21 a month. Starter covers them for $17.93 a month on yearly billing, against $19.50 for Gologin Professional 100.
- 1,000 profiles and more: Nstbrowser costs much less. Starter covers 20,000 profiles for $17.93 a month yearly, while Gologin Enterprise costs $89.50 for 1,000. Watch the launch limit: 3,000 a day on Starter.
- Proxies: Nstbrowser includes more traffic types in paid plans, but extra residential traffic costs $1.50 to $1.80 per GB, against $1 on Gologin.
Nstbrowser vs Gologin: Final Verdict
Nstbrowser is a capable tool for developers and automation teams: RPA, an API, an AI agent and a CAPTCHA solver on every plan, and thousands of profiles for little money. Its weak spot is the fingerprint. With default settings it got the lowest Iphey score in our test and ran a browser engine five versions old.
| Gologin | Nstbrowser | |
|---|---|---|
| Passed all 3 fingerprint checkers | ✅ | ❌ |
| Faster profile launch | ✅ | ❌ |
| Newer Chrome engine | ✅ | ❌ |
| Lower price at 1,000+ profiles | ❌ | ✅ |
| No launch limits | ✅ | ❌ |
| Free trial of paid features | ✅ | ❌ |
| Built-in RPA and AI agent | ❌ | ✅ |
| Linux app | ✅ | ❌ |
| Mobile apps | ✅ | ❌ |
| Cloud browser in a web tab | ✅ | ❌ |
Nstbrowser suits developers who run scraping and automation at scale and are ready to check every profile’s fingerprint by hand.
For everyone else, Gologin is the safer choice: clean fingerprints out of the box, apps on every platform, simple pricing per profile and a track record users can check. Compare more Nstbrowser alternatives or start with Gologin’s free trial.
